Critical Analysis of Kushner's 'Angels in America'

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Critical Analysis of Kushner’s ‘Angels in America’

A profound aspect that Tony Kushner incorporates throughout act one scene seven of Angels in America is the manner in which he defies the logic of Harpers hallucination. Despite Harper never having met Prior and stating that the mind shouldnt make up anything that wasnt there to start with, both Harper and Prior have specific knowledge of one another. Harper knows that Prior is unwell, and she has this knowledge since [t]his is the very threshold of revelation sometimes, whilst Prior also replies with [y]our husbands a homo, the colloquial use of homo somewhat trivializing Joes situation. This prevalent tone of ambiguity is further sustained through Kushners enigmatic sense of place, which is exemplified even in the stage directions preceding the dialogue, stating that Prior has appeared in this [hallucination]. Or Harper has appeared in Priors dream. The use of the conjunction or indicates that the location of this crossover is open for interpretation for the audience, and, fittingly, Kushner structures this scene in a very fragmented manner to support its ambiguous nature. For example, the scene is broken up into Harpers appearance and disappearance, during which a (Pause.) stage direction divides it further, and the unusual inclusion of A Voice towards the end of the scene followed by (Silence.) leaves Prior in a puzzled state. Kushners incorporation of exclamation and question marks in Priors line, Hello? Is that it? Helloooo!, enforces the tone of despair but also puzzlement, unsatisfactorily concluding the two bewildering encounters.

Amidst the tone of ambiguity that Kushner creates by subverting the logic of Harpers hallucination, the themes of change and fluid identity also have a strong presence throughout this scene. It is presented to us that Prior is undergoing a fluid transition in identity through his drag appearance, a change that Kushner indicates as a means of an escape from the pressing conventions of the ordinary world. For example, the manner in which Prior describes the stealing of the new makeup as an emotional emergency underlines his reliance on this change of identity to survive, and the alliterative e also emphasizes the importance of this form of salvation from the monotony of daily life. Similarly, Harper also struggles to achieve a sense of change, stating that the imagination is mere the same old ordinariness and falseness re-arranged into the appearance of novelty and truth. Kushners inclusion of the phrase same old in this line evokes a rather frustrated yet unsurprised tone, implying that, even with Harpers reliance on Valium and Priors dependence on his drag identity, they are still the same figures but re-modeled into different scenarios and identities. Moreover, this sense of constant change is epitomized in Priors comment that [p]eople come and go so quickly here&, indicating the rash, changeable nature of Priors encounter with both Harper and the voice. Although individually Harper and Prior struggle to achieve a sense of change, it is the encounters themselves that remain unstable.

Click Here To Order Now!