Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Cuban Revolution and Che Guevaras Journey: Critical Analysis of the Book
Ches Afterlife: The Legacy of an Image is a book written by Australian author Michael Casey, published in April 2009. It spans 400 pages of Latin American history revolving around the famed Korda photo of Ernesto Che Guevara. The thesis of this text is that, while Che Guevaras image has relatively maintained its ideological magnetism, it has been used too broadly to be the symbol of any clear ideology. In Caseys view, Che has become the quintessential postmodern icon [of] anything to anyone and everything to everyone. [1] To support his thesis, the author examines the history of the photo around the world and explores the mechanisms of mainstream art. Michael Casey is an author and researcher of economics, digital technology, and geopolitics. He was a Wall Street Journal columnist and has covered events in South-East Asia, Europe, and Latin America.[2]
Ches Afterlife takes a novelist approach through the history of the image of Che Guevara frequently used by politicians, protestors, and businesses. Taken by Cuban photographer Alberto Korda Gutierrez, it features a 31-year-old Che at the state funeral for victims of the La Coubre explosion. The book examines the influence of the Korda photo through time and different locations. Casey begins his journey when he spots a bumper sticker of the Korda Che beside an image of Rambo in Thailand. Despite their guerilla-like resemblance, the author was intrigued by why these political opposites were shown together.[3] The book then embarks on Che Guevaras journey from medical student to world-renowned revolutionary. All the while, Casey critiques Ches performance as a comandante, minister, and martyr. One of the books striking features is its objective analysis of the history of five different countries. Casey makes comparisons between how Guevara impacted the socio-political frameworks of Argentina, Bolivia, Cuba, Venezuela, and the United States. Casey presents Argentina as Ches birthplace, while Bolivia was fundamental in his death.[4] He explains how Cuba set the stage for the rise of Ches legend and how Venezuelas Hugo Chavez was central in its revival. Lastly, Casey covers how America affected Ches fate, and how Che influenced the American culture. From a historiographical perspective, these chapters are impressive due to their structure and the authors comparisons between each country.
The first noticeable feature of the Korda Che is its dissemination. Expectedly, Latin American revolutionaries continue to use the image as their banner. However, the symbol has been donned by unlikely movements as well. It was a part of Irans Islamic revolution to the extent that decades later, Guevaras children were invited as honorary guests to speak at Tehran University.[5] The image has made Che a hero of the Intifada for Palestinians.[6] Ches legacy is present in Nepal, where the Workers and Peasants Party advertises the Korda photo on billboards.[7] These instances are intriguing because they show that Ches appeal is not limited to leftist movements. The Korda Che is not merely an anti-American symbol either; South-Sudanese Christian separatists, backed by the United States, embraced Che Guevara as an image of their struggle against the Al-Bashir regime.[8] The author explains that the modern perception of Che is not a communist one, but rather, it is one of commitment to a creed. Casey describes Guevara as a man, a teacher, [who] lays down a code of personal conduct from which to build a just society, a utopia, and then proceeds to live and die according to it. [9]
Casey then argues that the popularization of the Korda Che was not a natural phenomenon, but rather a calculated political move. The book provides a background of the events preceding the capture of the photo by Alberto Korda. Casey posits that the photographer was just as essential in the making of the Guerrillero Heroico as Guevara himself. Before the revolution, Korda was a leading fashion photographer. Despite his extravagant lifestyle, Korda still managed to integrate into the revolutions mood, becoming Fidel Castros favorite photographer. [10] Kordas photo remained hidden for many years. The photo was released as Che left Cuba indefinitely. He had become critical of the Russians for not supporting third world liberation, while Castro recognized that the regime’s survival depended on Soviet support.[11] This disagreement led to Ches mysterious exit from political life in Cuba. Two years after Che vanished, the Korda image was released into public consciousness in Cuba. Fidel Castro exploited the image as a propaganda tool in 1967, six months before Che’s death.[12] Casey describes this action as one of the Cuban revolutions greatest marketing accomplishments, [13] comparing the Korda Che with the Nike Swoosh. Ches eventual death in Bolivia further complemented the photos popularity.
In the final chapters, Casey searches for the definitive meaning of Guevaras brand. At times teasing the irony of Ches success in market capitalism, Casey lists a myriad of consumer products sporting the Korda image, showing how Che has been transformed into a globally marketable product. His old home in Argentina has since become a Che Guevara museum.[14] Ultimately, Casey suggests that adopting Che is a very personal act .[15] It is the spirituality of Ches visage that creates its appeal. The physical features of the revolutionary illustrate a sense of immortality. The author states that this sense of immortality is a source of hope for people, which encourages them to defeat death. [16] The connection that the book establishes between all of the uses of Ches brand is that it is a symbol of resistance against an imagined threat.
Ches Afterlife reads like a novel, making complex characters and events understandable. Casey does this through the use of many subjective and objective sources including published memoirs and interviews, describing historic figures holistically. The author refers to many scholarly articles and books by both historians and those involved in the Cuban revolution. He uses political sociologist, Eric Selbins Zapatas White Horse and Ches Beret to reference Ches legacy. The author also conducted several interviews with Che-admirers, expatriates, and commoners. Most notably, his interview with Felix Rodríguez, the CIA agent who witnessed Guevaras death, is an intriguing source of information because it is arguably the closest source of Ches final moments.[17] Most scholarly publications are easily accessible. Many citations come from Latin American sources dating as far back as the 1960s, such as Che Guevaras The African Dream: The Diaries of the Revolutionary War in the Congo. The author also had access to hidden archives from Sara Vega, a researcher at the Cuban Film Institute (ICAIC). Despite referencing sources whose involvement in the Cuban revolution could produce biased information, there is a balance in sources from partisans on either side of the conflict. Therefore, the sources offer diverse perspectives. By using historical facts as well, Casey leaves the morals of politics and ideology up to the reader, but the author could have further solidified his credibility by depending more on academic publications for his work. While the use of documentaries, interviews, and memoirs provides a creative angle, it diminishes the credibility of the book as a historiographical work.
On minor occasions, the author overlooks certain details. In the leadup to the authors description of the Korda Che, he expresses the idea that Guevara was not well-known in the Western world.[18] In reality, Che was consistently present in Western media and student circles. Historians like Van Gosse have argued that the Cuban revolution was a source of inspiration for some American New Leftists as Che was leading the assault on Santa Clara.[19] Che Guevara was also the main topic during his visit to New York in 1964.[20] Malcolm X is believed to have also praised Che in a positive light.[21] Similarly, Guevara conducted many interviews in Europe as Cubas Minister of Industry, before the photos release. Either through hate or adoration, the American public was aware of his presence.
Overall, Ches Afterlife uncovered facts, clarified misconceptions, and tended to both admirers and opposers of the notorious revolutionary. The overarching theme of this narrative proved that the ideological image of Che Guevara has been preserved, but its popularization led to its adoption by broad groups meaning that Ches legacy no longer belongs to just communism or the Cuban revolution. Casey has contributed many theoretical methodologies to prove his thesis. Despite some unnoticed details, he provides fair arguments and transparent historical analysis. His theoretical approaches focus on causation, tracing the roots of the Korda photos popularity to historical events, the use of artistic techniques, and Guevaras legacy. The book was released at a lively time; Fidel Castro had recently stepped down from Cubas presidency in favor of his brother.[22] This was reciprocated by the change in the American presidency, increasing the prospect of diplomacy. Over four decades of sanctions had affected Cuba, prompting Raul Castro to embark on socio-economic reforms and so the European Union lifted sanctions on Cuba.[23] By 2009, Obama eased travel and remittance restrictions, an important step in normalizing relations.[24] As Caseys first work, the book was well-received. Critics like Deborah Adams have praised the book as admirable and well-written.[25] Kirkus Reviews states that while Casey focuses on his perception of the Korda photo, he gets lost in trivial Latin American politics at times. The review describes Ches Afterlife as a meandering but heady exploration of a focal point of politics and popular culture. [26] This book is most useful for the younger generation, who are exposed to Ches image yet are unaware of his story. Through its diverse references, Ches Afterlife signifies that history is not as clear as good and evil, Che Guevara is revered as much as he is hated. The young generation will have to rely on the works of authors such as Michael Casey to find the truth and make their own judgments.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.