Karl Marx and a Conflict Theory - Special Academic Support

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

A conflict theorist would typically state that people with wealth and power represent a society. Excluding the lower class; law and law enforcement are used by dominant groups to minimize threats to society and have control over lower class being biased and protecting the wealthy. In this case a Latino male of the lower class steals $1,000 from a convenience store and is served to 3 years in jail. While a white male who owns a business steals $100,000 from his place of business and serves 9 months to federal prison but needs to pay back what he stole. In these two cases that are at a similar crime rate have yet so much inequality causing conflict between the two.

As Karl Marx explains social life is a competition between wealthy and lower class. Since the Latino male came from a lower class and doesnt have the proper resources as society would describe his punishment is way stricter. Both crimes were against the law. Conflict theorist say law and law enforcement are used by dominant groups to minimize threats to society and control the lower class. The white male committed the same crime breaking the law but should’ve received a stricter punishment because he stole more and got served to less time due to his class rate. This would be described as a conflict theorist not wanting a bad rep on those of the higher class and protecting a society in one.

Our judicial systems job is to interpret the law. Workers in this field do not treat people equally because over time the wrong people get arrested for the wrong things or in other cases people do not receive the punishment they deserve. Conflicts explain how the people are treated differently due to inequality which ends up becoming a significant source of conflict. The bond theory identifies the state and the law as instruments of power used by the ruling class for their own benefit

Knowing certain people live in places where crimes are committed continuously you would count on this system to make the right decisions. When two people commit the same crime, the same punishment should be served no matter what class you are in. Conflicts explain this doesnt usually happen because of how powerful the ruling class is in a society. People of wealth take over those of the lower class in every aspect. Other reasonings are when people do something sometimes due to who people know and how much money they have ones who are guilty receive little to no punishment and the innocent who have nothing are severely punished due to the less resource’s they are appointed too. Laws are something that are set rules and shouldnt be changed due to someones opinion. A judge can quickly decide what one person will do for the rest of their life and no one else has say which is made unfair. In a sense, if there were rules set and never changed society would know what is right and what is not.

Click Here To Order Now!