Parable Of Sower By Octavia Butler As The Trump Country Prediction

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Parable Of Sower By Octavia Butler As The Trump Country Prediction

The novel, Parable of Sower by Octavia E. Butler was ahead of its time when it was published in 1993. The book is set in a prospect the 2020s where the government has buckled and centers the Lauren Olamina, who can feel and perceive pain along with many additional sensations. These feelings, consequentially, are what keep Lauren on her own path to not acknowledge the belief system in place, the system of the elders. As a young adolescent living in the gated community in Los Angeles, she develops a benevolent religion and philosophical religion. Around the time Lauren is first introduced to us, there is increased resource scarcity and elevated levels of poverty, which has led the civil society to revert to relative anarchism. When the communitys security is threatened, Laurens home is broken when her family is murdered. From here on forth, Lauren starts to believe in hyper empathy syndrome which shes convinced she got from her drug-addicted mother, who died whilst giving birth to her.

We can see that there is no such thing as freedom in Laurens life. When she goes out, she must be armed. After the first shock and devastation that came over Lauren, she decided to travel North together with other survivors to start a new community of her own and practice her own religion and/or faith: Earthseed. The times arent ideal as one can imagine. The novel describes class disparity as apparent and visibly failing. They are divided into three classes: poor, middle-class, and rich. The wealth disparity is tearing the country apart, especially with politicians giving empty promises with how the conditions will change and how they will improve all the distress and failing economies. Its again; much to Butlers credit, very ahead of its time and proof of the more things change the more they stay the same, fiction, or sadly, non-fiction as these are the problems we are facing. This difference is much more pronounced in Parable of the Sower; Lauren and her community are fortunate can have a house in a walled community but no money or resources to accommodate a relocation to a safer. The only people who are fortunate to move are the rich class, and they have the money to pay for their safety as well. People who are that rich live in estates as Lauren calls them: one big house and lots of shacky little dependencies were the servant’s life. The poor, on the other hand, are not as fortunate. The poor live outside the walls and tend to die young and very painfully like Laurens brother Curtis did shortly before her neighborhood burned down.

This disparity is drawn upon heavily in an article by Holly Otterbein titled Sanders casts an eye toward Trump Country. Otterbein cynically insinuated an instigation that most democratic voters can foresee if Bernie Sanders is the Democratic nominee. Trump told working people that he was going to be on their side. He is not on their side Sanders said. By the end of this campaign, I suspect that a number of people who voted for Donald Trump will understand that he is not their friend and that the agenda that we have, which is prepared to take on the billionaire class, is the agenda they will support. To a Trump supporter, these accusations towards his administration are not going to stick, which there lies the problem. How people can be so blinded to follow a leader that they cannot see is against their best interest. As a liberal voter, Trump has made no attempt to help the poor, and his self-proclaimed accomplishments are trickle-down economics from the Obama administration. Yes, while he did foster more job growth by making companies come back to America, I am often left wonder what the corporate agenda behind this was. That tax breaks are the wealthy receiving to induce such a move. Are the tax breaks they receiving equaling out to the number of new jobs created? One has left to wonder. Let us not forget the bank bailout that was meant to stimulate the economy. Time has proven that the upper class and associated politicians only look out for their own self-interest.

Click Here To Order Now!