Special Academic Support

Home

Order Now

—

by

admin
in
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Quantitative Analysis of Sex Differences in Traumas

The Ethical Aspects of the Study

  1. Not presented.
  2. The study does not operate the consent of the subjects since it analyzes the data based on articles reviews (Tolin & Foa, 2006).
  3. The research uses neither the names nor the private data of the subjects. Therefore, the provisions for anonymity are preserved.
  4. The analysis targets the vulnerable subjects, which suffer from traumatism.
  5. It is impossible to identify whether the subjects were coerced into participation since the data comes from diverse sources.
  6. Initially, the study framework did not presuppose any implementation risks.
  7. Not presented.
  8. Not presented.

The Problem Statements, Purpose Statements, and Research Questions

  1. The research area regards traumatism and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder treatment (Tolin & Foa, 2006).
  2. The problem statement reveals the idea of gender discrepancies between stress traumatism occurrence among males and females. The purpose statement aims at the verification of the hypothesis, due to which, women were more likely to suffer from PTSD than men. Finally, the research questions regard the foundation of male and female assaults that are the sources of PTSD.
  3. Such variables as the age of the participants and measurement designs are revealed in the study.
  4. The study is quantitative since it employs some mathematical models such as the DerSimonian-Laird ratio and confidence interval.
  5. The study uses an elaborate filtration of the research materials. Thus, the empirical data is relevant to the area of investigation.
  6. The feasibility of the study is revealed through the implicit correlation of study questions to the practical appliance of the data.
  7. The findings may be further used for the elaboration of trauma treatment approaches.

Literature Review Critique

  1. The research study does not outline the literature review. However, it provides information on the selection of articles, which is highly comprehensive.
  2. The account of literature selection is concise and properly structured.
  3. The research serves as the primary material for the study. Therefore, it applies to the purpose of the investigation.
  4. Not presented.
  5. Not presented.
  6. Both classic and current articles are used as references.
  7. The paraphrases prevail over the direct quotes in the text.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The sources are secondary since they primarily include studies and nursing reviews.
  10. All the cited articles are presented in the reference list.
  11. There are no errors in the citation of the sources.

The Study Framework

  1. The structure that encompasses traumatism study is identified in the introductory part of the paper.
  2. The framework is based on the congregation of diverse nursing theories that regard traumas and PTSD.
  3. The framework complies with the purpose of the work.
  4. The traumatism-related concepts are defined in the study.
  5. The relationships between the concepts are not clearly described, due to the diverse nature of the study subjects.
  6. Not presented.
  7. Not presented.
  8. The scientists correlate the findings to the primary assumption that was differentiated in the introduction.
  9. The outcomes of the research provide a foundation for the framework since they summarize the issues of gender traumatism.

Hypotheses and Research Questions Critique

  1. The research study contains a primary hypothesis, due to which females are more vulnerable to stress than males.
  2. The hypothesis is clear, and it is reiterated in the body of the research as well as in the conclusion.
  3. The hypothesis is written in a declarative sentence.
  4. The hypothesis serves as a description of the primary research problem.
  5. The assumption is derived from the general nursing framework, which focuses on traumatism and PTSD.
  6. The hypothesis concerns two genders. Thus, two variables of the statement are regarded.
  7. The initial statement is directional since it stipulates the research questions as well as the selection of subjects.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The fundamental hypothesis contains two predictions.

Quantitative Research Design Analysis

  1. The research design is revealed in a form of consecutive questions, which provide information about the gender specifications of traumas.
  2. The design is appropriate to the type of research since the answer to each question summarizes the critical points that are derived from the analyzed articles.
  3. Not presented.
  4. Not presented.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The research design allows the reader to distinguish the peculiarities of stress among the diverse groups of subjects.
  7. The experimental research design does not apply to the review of articles. However, since the study employed two mathematical models, it could have been appropriate to verify them in practice.
  8. Not presented.

Qualitative Design Critique

  1. The qualitative design could be applied to the study if the verification of confidence interval was excluded from the research.
  2. Not presented.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The study has traumatism-related implications for nursing research.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The sample size was selected based on psychometric properties.
  7. Data selection procedure is described in detail.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The sample size chosen relates to the purpose of the study.
  10. The study limitations and findings are presented in separate parts of the paper.
  11. Not presented.

Developing the Model of Cancer QLQ-C30 Treatment

The Ethical Aspects of the Study

  1. The results of the quantitative research were verified and ascertained by the Institutional Review Board.
  2. The consent was obtained from the subjects. However, 12 participants could not provide the information since they died till the end of the experiment (Aaronson et al., 1993).
  3. The data about the patients was strictly confidential.
  4. The study concerned vulnerable subjects, which suffered from cancer.
  5. The patients were likely coerced into the procedures of the experiment since the study involved the subjects, which had the 4th stage of cancer. Accordingly, such participants could not have been responsible for their responses.
  6. The study did not damage the health of the patients. Therefore, the results outweigh the participation.
  7. Not presented.
  8. Not presented.

The Problem Statements, Purpose Statements, and Research Questions

  1. The research area, which is cancer treatment, is identified.
  2. The problem statement regards the relation between the quality of life and a remedy for cancer. The purpose of the research is the verification of the QLQ-C30 form. The research question is whether the questionnaire provides reliable information about the functional and symptom scales.
  3. The study contains information about the variables and population.
  4. The research is quantitative since it provides an empirical investigation with statistical information.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The study was confidential and did not bring harm to the subjects. Thus, it may be called ethical.
  7. Not presented.
  8. The significance of the study concerning nursing is evident, for it can be used for matching the quality of life with treatment.

Literature Review Critique

  1. The literature review is not explicitly presented in the body of the study.
  2. Not presented.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The sources are relevant to the topic of cancer treatment.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The bibliography includes classic sources mostly.
  7. paraphrases are used more often than direct quotes.
  8. Not presented.
  9. Secondary sources are prevalent.
  10. All the cited sources are in the reference list.
  11. The references seem to be properly cited.

The Study Framework

  1. The framework of the patients quality of life improvement is clearly outlined.
  2. The research is based on both nursing and social studies theory.
  3. The framework corresponds to the purpose statement.
  4. The concepts that were incorporated into the form questionnaire are clearly defined.
  5. The relationships between the concepts of life quality and cancer disease are well-demonstrated.
  6. Not presented.
  7. Not presented.
  8. The outcomes are related to the quality of life standards, which are outlined in the introductory part.
  9. The research findings provide a consistent framework for primary nursing research.

Hypotheses and Research Questions Critique

  1. The study contains a hypothesis, due to which the improvement of life quality issues reduces the lethal outcomes of cancer disease.
  2. The hypothesis may be derived from the framework outline but is not directly stated.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The hypothesis determines the idea of the study.
  5. The hypothesis is identified in the general nursing framework.
  6. Not presented.
  7. The hypothesis is directional since it suggests the outcomes of the study.
  8. The hypothesis can be empirically tested both about cancer treatment and some other diseases that are influenced by the quality of life.
  9. The initial statement contains two primary predictions about the correspondence of life conditions to the outcomes of cancer treatment.

Quantitative Research Design Analysis

  1. The design of the experiment is described in detail and with the account of all consecutive evaluations such as multitrait scaling, validity assessment, etc.
  2. The design of the study provides an effective response to the research questions, which aim at the evaluation of life quality measurements.
  3. Not presented.
  4. Not presented.
  5. Not presented.
  6. Not presented.
  7. The research study possesses a non-experimental design since it analyzes the typical measurements that demonstrate the relationship between life quality and cancer treatment. Thus, the primary data is in disposure of the scientists, and there is no need to apply the experimental design to the assessment.
  8. The specifications of the patients health and personal conditions were employed as the means of extraneous control since the data influences the behavior of the participants as well as their responses to the questions of the analyzed form.

Qualitative Design Critique

  1. The study dwells on the evaluation of life conditions, which applies to the sphere of social studies. Therefore, the descriptive means of analysis, which are peculiar to the qualitative research, would be highly applicable.
  2. The scientists take into account the factor of human behavior.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The study has significance for nursing, for it predetermines the quality of cancer treatment among diverse groups of patients.
  5. The scientists dwell on the specifications of the participants health and social backgrounds as well as their ethnic features.
  6. The sample size was determined by the questionnaire from rubrics.
  7. Not presented.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The data analysis lacks descriptive features. Therefore, it is not consistent.
  10. The limitations are not presented in the paper. However, the findings are properly described.
  11. The recommendations for further nursing research are based on the outcomes of the study.

The Evaluation of Renal Outcomes in Hypertensive Patients

The Ethical Aspects of the Study

  1. The study possesses an official Institutional Review Board approval.
  2. The patients, who were investigated in the research, agreed with the usage of their medical data.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The study targeted the cohort of hypertensive patients. Therefore, it may be claimed that the subjects are vulnerable (Rahman et al., 2006).
  5. The paper is based on the real medical data that applies to patients with ESPD. There is no sign of coercing the subjects.
  6. The outcomes had a positive influence on the health of the patients, who suffer from end-stage renal disease. Therefore, the results outweighed the risks.
  7. Not presented.
  8. Not presented.

The Problem Statements, Purpose Statements, and Research Questions

  1. The research is of hypertension treatment assessment is clearly outlined.
  2. The purpose of testing treatment of hypertensive patients with calcium channel and the angiotensin-converting enzyme is revealed directly. The problem statement, as well as the research question, is not presented in the paper.
  3. People of different ages represent the variables.
  4. The study is quantitative since it operates mathematical data distribution.
  5. Not presented.
  6. Not presented.
  7. Not presented.
  8. The study findings make a recommendation as to the usage of chlorthalidone in the reduction of ESPD. The data may be used in subsequent research investigations.

Literature Review Critique

  1. Not presented.
  2. Not presented.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The sources are based on the relevant studies of hypertension and ESPD development.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The study primarily employs current articles as references.
  7. The paper represents more paraphrases than quotes.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The secondary sources are most cited.
  10. All the references are properly cited.
  11. The references contain no errors.

The Study Framework

  1. There is no explicit outline of the research framework in the study.
  2. The data is based primarily on nursing and medical theories. However, it refers to some laws of physics as well.
  3. The framework does not fully correspond to the study since there is no clear identification of the significance of the outcome.
  4. The conceptual foundation is weakly developed.
  5. Not presented.
  6. There is a propositional statement in the work. According to it, calcium channel blockers provided a more efficient treatment of hypertension than diuretics.
  7. Not presented.
  8. Not presented.
  9. Not presented.

Hypotheses and Research Questions Critique

  1. The initial hypothesis makes a recommendation as to hypertension and ESRD prevention.
  2. The hypothesis is identified. It is concise.
  3. The declarative sentence recounts the idea of the hypothesis.
  4. Not presented.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The age of the patients is taken into consideration.
  7. The initial statement is directional since it predetermines the development of research.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The research study operates a single prediction.

Quantitative Research Design Analysis

  1. The subsequent procedures that constitute the study design are recounted in the introductory part of the work. However, the description lacks the explanation of some critical medical terms.
  2. The quantitative research design provides consistent data that relates the usage of analyzed substances to hypertension.
  3. Not presented.
  4. Not presented.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The foundation of the study design involves the interrelation between the stimulators of treatment processes and their outcomes, which implies the application of cause-effect bonds between the variables.
  7. The experimental design does not apply to the situation since the medicine that was tested could produce some unexpected effects on the subjects.
  8. Not presented.

Qualitative Design Critique

  1. The quantitative design is more appropriate for the study than the qualitative one since it suggests adequate modification outcomes, which stipulate the treatment.
  2. Not presented.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The significance of the investigation results usage regards the issue of hypertension reduction, which may influence further nursing studies on the issue.
  5. The participants were selected based on their ESRD syndromes.
  6. The samples were differentiated through the estimation of hypertension effects.
  7. The study results, as well as the data that relates to the calculation of the hypertension ratio, are fully described.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The mathematical calculation of the ratios corresponds to the propositional statement.
  10. Such critical limitation as the lack of information of proteinuria level is recounted.
  11. Not presented.

The Global Burden of Diabetes

The Ethical Aspects of the Study

  1. Not presented.
  2. The consent was not obtained from the participants of the study, due to the huge number of subjects.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The subjects were vulnerable since the investigation involves a wide range of diabetes-prone individuals (King, Aubert, & Herman, 1998).
  5. The paper does not contain any evidence of the subjects being coerced into the action.
  6. The results of the investigation prove cross-national information on diabetes occurrence. Therefore, the risks are considerably outweighed.
  7. The participants of the investigation were not provided with the opportunity to contact the scientists.
  8. The subjects did not receive the information about the obtaining of results.

The Problem Statements, Purpose Statements, and Research Questions

  1. The research area targets the problem of diabetes and is clearly outlined.
  2. The purpose statement outlines the objective of diabetes ration calculation. The problem statement involves the national, economic, and gender disparities in the area of diabetes occurrence. Finally, the work raises some questions as to the existence of age-specific groups of diabetes patients. All three points are carefully specified.
  3. The primary study variables of age and ethnicity, as well as population distinctions, are described in the work.
  4. The study is quantitative since it is based on the complex of ratio calculations.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The study possesses a few unethical implications such as wealth distinction.
  7. The feasibility of the study is apparent from the outcomes of ration compilations.
  8. The study provides some materials for further nursing studies on the issue of diabetes.

Literature Review Critique

  1. Not presented.
  2. Not presented.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The sources disclose some nursing theories and investigations and include mostly empirical data, which is relevant to the topic theory.
  5. Not presented.
  6. Mostly classic sources are provided in the reference list.
  7. The paraphrases are primarily used by the authors. The direct quotes are rare.
  8. Not presented.
  9. Since the prevalent sources regard the quality assessments and studies, the references are secondary.
  10. All sources are cited.
  11. The reference list does not contain any mistakes.

The Study Framework

  1. The framework of the diabetes assessment study is distinctively outlined in the introductory part of the work.
  2. The framework is based on a general nursing theory as well as on the basic social studies overview.
  3. The framework corresponds to the purpose statement of the work.
  4. The concept of diabetes, as well as its medical specifications, is not fully described in the work.
  5. The relationships between the analyzed conceptions are strongly developed and justified.
  6. Not presented.
  7. Not presented.
  8. The scientists relate the findings of the investigation to the framework of life conditions area and the nursing implications.
  9. The findings support the initial framework assumptions.

Hypotheses and Research Questions Critique

  1. Not presented.
  2. The general hypotheses that concern the age and gender distinctions of diabetes may be derived from the content of the study; however, they are quite wordy.
  3. The hypotheses are not written in declarative sentences.
  4. The assumptions about the specifications of the disease are related to the general study area.
  5. Not presented.
  6. Every hypothesis relates to a certain cohort of the population.
  7. The predictions that are made by the scientists guide the readers and provide the fundament for further investigation.
  8. Not presented.
  9. Each hypothesis represents several predictions. For instance, the progress of diabetes in different countries is related to the different aspects of their economic development.

Quantitative Research Design Analysis

  1. The design of the work is recounted in the introductory part.
  2. The design is devised with relation to every suggestion. Specifically, it estimates the occurrence of diabetes, due to the aspects of national distribution, age, gender, and economic conditions.
  3. Not presented.
  4. Not presented.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The interrelations between the variables are apparent. For instance, the reader can establish the cause-effect relations between the conditions of social life in certain countries and the diabetes specifications.
  7. The experimental design would be appropriate for the verification of diabetes treatment or prevention. However, the design does not apply to the analyzed study.
  8. Not presented.

Qualitative Design Critique

  1. Since the study embraces multiple descriptive features and literature reviews, there is a possibility to apply qualitative research design to it.
  2. The work targets the subjective personal activities and the social backgrounds of the subjects.
  3. Not presented.
  4. The study outcomes may be used as practical materials for nursing investigations as well as for the compilation of treatment planning.
  5. Not presented.
  6. The sample size was outlined through the differentiation of the social life standard ratio that prevents the infliction of diabetes.
  7. The recording of data is not provided in the work. However, the scientists describe the critical steps of the investigation.
  8. Not presented.
  9. The findings comply with the purpose of the work.
  10. The authors do not recount the limitations in the work.
  11. The basic recommendations as to the usage of the materials in diabetes treatment planning are made.

HIV/AIDS Estimation: Rural Areas Perspective

The Ethical Aspects of the Study

  1. Not presented.
  2. The investigation was launched after the subjects agreed to enter the clinical study.
  3. The participants received a document, according to which their data was kept in secrecy.
  4. The subjects were represented by HIV/AIDS patients. Thus, the participants were vulnerable (Morgan et al., 2001).
  5. The subjects were not coerced into action since they were instructed by the home visitors on the content of the experiment and provided consent to become thrts of the study.
  6. The outcomes of the study revealed the calculations of HIV/AIDS rating. Therefore, the results surpassed the possible risks.
  7. The subjects had an opportunity to contact the scientists at any stage of the investigation.
  8. The participants were informed about the results of th

    Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
    We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
    You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

    NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

    NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

    Click Here To Order Now!