Difference Of Portrayal Of Women In Sonnets

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Difference Of Portrayal Of Women In Sonnets

The development of English sonnets is one of the most remarkable features of Elizabethan literature. The sonnet, a short lyric poem of fourteen lines, owes its origin to Italian writers, such as Petrarch and Dante. The theme of Petrarchan sonnet was usually courtly love- worshipful adoration of an idealised mistress and a sense of elevating and even spiritualising the function of love.

Two practitioners of the form of sonnet, namely, William Shakespeare and Sir Philip Sidney, deviated a little from the original Petrarchan theme and put in their own inventions to the sonnet form. A discussion regarding the differences in the works of Shakespeare and Sidney will be explored here. I will look at Shakespeares Sonnets and Astrophil and Stella, respectively. There is a stark difference in the projection of the women in the above mentioned sonnet sequences. Hence, this paper will attempt to study how Shakespeares Dark Lady and Sidneys Stella though polar opposites in terms of beauty have been given the same elevated status.

Sir Philip Sidney wrote a total of 108 sonnets and 11 songs in his sonnet sequence, Astrophil and Stella, which was published in 1591. His work started the vogue for sonnet sequence- like Shakespeares Sonnets. Unlike Shakespeare, it is clear that Sidney composed these sonnets remembering his ladylove, Penelope Rich, daughter of the Earl of Essex.

In sonnet 7, Stellas beauty is being vividly portrayed. Since Stella is a star, this sonnet describes her beauty through her eyes, whose beams shine as stars from the black sky. The conventional conceit becomes literal when it is noticed that Lady Richs eyes were in fact black. Astrophil says in this poem that black seems beautys contrary, while Shakespeare praises that very same black as his mistress.

In sonnet 12, it is supposed that Astrophil who represents passion, will and carnal desires, will never be able to conquer Stella who represents virtue, reason and wit.

The praise of the clear voyce in sonnet 12, prepares a role for her quite different from that of the distant and disdainful mistress (music hath a far more pleasing sound). There are many contrasting verses as such in both the sonnet sequences. Stellas sweet breath, sun-like, and lips swell, so full of thee they be is in stark contrast to Dark Ladys breath that from my mistress reeks, nothing like the sun and coral is far more red than her lips red respectively.

Cupid, because thou shinst in Stellas eyes/That from her locks, thy day-nets, none scapes free.

Sonnet 12 begins with Cupid being used as a symbol of desire. Cupid shines in Stellas eyes, and her hair functions as Cupids trap.

Even the names given by the writers to the lady of their respective works is also no coincidence. Shakespeare uses Dark Lady because his sonnets aptly describe the love of an ordinary woman who is dirty and dark, yet is deserving of the speakers love. Sidney preferred the names- Stella (star: the symbol of the Light of Reason) and Astrophil (star-lover: the Lover of Reason).

Like many other Renaissance poets, Sidney also, experiences and incarnates the sum of lifes power and perfections in the beauty of their chaste and elegant ladies. Yet, Shakespeares Sonnets to the Dark Lady dwell on her imperfections and falsehood.

William Shakespeare wrote a total of 154 sonnets in his sonnet sequence, Shakespeares Sonnets, which was published in 1609. The final set- 126 to 154- is addressed to a promiscuous and scheming woman known to the readers as the Dark Lady. Shakespeare used, but also subverted, the sonnet conventions employed by Sidney and others.

Sonnet number 130 is a parody of the kind of insincere, sickly sweet love poems that authors have been writing for centuries. This particular verse is all about breaking stereotypes and expectations of female beauty. The speaker insists that his idea of feminism does not depend on fitting an abstract, unrealistic fantasy and to criticize the quixotic expectations that men have for female beauty. Shakespeare tactfully uses this sonnet to mock the early conventions of exaggerated comparisons. One can see how well he uses this sonnet to skewer lame poetic clichés. Yet, the question remains whether the poet is expressing Shakespeares personal feelings. In sonnet 130, there is no use of grandiose, metaphor or allusion- he does not compare his love to Venus, there is no evocation to Morpheus and so on- unlike Sidney who uses Cupid in sonnet 12 to describe the beauty of Stella. The ordinary beauty and humanity of his lover are of importance to Shakespeare in this sonnet. The references of metaphorical objects are present, but they are to illustrate that his lover is not as beautiful- a total rejection of Petrarchs form.

And yet, by heaven, I think my love as rare/As any she belied with false compare.

The couplet of this sonnet serves as a payoff for the entire poem. It serves as the punch-line for the joke. It drives home the speakers main point: unlike other poets he does not need flowery terms or fancy comparisons. He can just tell his mistress, plainly and simply, that he loves her for who she is.

In sonnet 141, the speaker says that he cannot love the Dark Lady with his eyes because they a thousand errors note. The speakers foolish heart super-cedes his five wits and five senses, unlike that of Astrophil who is smitten by Stellas looks and virtues.

It can be said that both Shakespeare and Sidney are infatuated with their lady loves who are unattainable. Whilst, Sidney follows the trend of Love being like a fair and virtuous Goddess, Shakespeare breaks norms by equally disgracing and admiring a dark woman who is not really attractive to look at. The speaker in Shakespeares Sonnets knows that his mistress is not aesthetic nor is anything about her so pleasing, yet he cannot help himself in falling in love with her, keeping all her imperfections aside. Stella, on the other hand, is the epitome of feminine, grace, wit, and beauty so much so that even though Astrophil knows, that it is next to impossible that such an ethereal beauty like Stella could be his, yet he admires her so much that he even goes on to say, she even in black doth make all beauties flow? The similarity being that both these women are given the same high elevated status, yet so opposite and different to each other. Such is the greatness of both the writers, that they portray the qualities of their lady loves in their own special way, which has no parallel till date.

Click Here To Order Now!