Dystopian Literature: Limiting Language Means Limiting Freedom

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Dystopian Literature: Limiting Language Means Limiting Freedom

Dystopian Literature question the potential power that language has in both Atwood HMT and Orwells 1984, where it presents the need to use language as a form of identity, gaining knowledge and its various uses in expressions.

The Handmaids Tale presents the loss of individualism by the handmaids’ patronymic names. Atwood deliberately uses preposition before the name of the commander in charge Offred to create a new identity so that they can fulfil the new function in the forceful regime. Similarly in 1984 the importance of name signifies the importance as Orwell only mentions Julias first name and not her last, which could contribute the notion of a womans last name being insignificant because of its changeability. This was usually at the time when the women would take the last names of their husband thus linking to 1984 and Handmaids Tale since this perception of a woman’s name therefore limits the freedom that women could experience. During Atwoods time, second wave feminism was brought in to fights for their rights to vote and the many injustices that they were faced with in order to fight against these social conventions the novels are presenting.

Language is presented in a deceptive manner in both 1984 and The handmaids tale as it also contributes to limiting freedom. In 1984 theres a clear indication of deceptiveness when the names of the buildings Ministry of Love, Ministry of Truth, Ministry of Peace are actually antonyms, thus creates a false appearance which employs the concept established in the novel called doublethink and also emphasises the actual role they have in Ingsoc. The Ministry of Truth specifically changes the truth of news, entertainment and more into fitting the partys ideologies. This is similar to how Adolf Hitler, former leader of Nazi Germany, used education to imprint the Partys ideology into childrens textbooks. These ideologies were to love Hitler, Anti-Semitism, militarism and to be obedient to ones state. By also using familial terms such as Big Brother defies its loving nature of the words as its sole purpose is to become an icon that forces its citizens to idolise him or else face the consequences by being vaporised. In Handmaid’s Tale Atwood also uses a familiar term, Aunts to mask the threat they can cause. It is clear that the aunts have an important role in the society as Offred does link in throughout the novel of the different rules and expectations that Aunt Lydia said, a handmaids must hold. It links in with a darker motive of the government to use these figures in order indoctrinate the Handmaid’s into fulfilling their functions. Therefore language is used to deceive the citizens into believing the inaccurate truths and figures of the party, thus limiting their freedom.

By also controlling the language, it restricts the societys individual right to express themselves by removing the individual thoughts that cannot be expressed. In 1984 the governments creation of Newspeak withdraws the citizens rights of freedom of speech as Symes exclaims that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought, so by narrowing the ways a human can express themselves, it would in a sense expel any rebellious behaviour as there would be no words to express these emotions. When Winston does get hold of a book and starts to write DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER hes able to express himself properly. In Handmaids Tale when Luke says to Offred about the meaning of Mayday, Its French he said. From Maidez/Help me it encourages the readers to also reflect on the forgotten Origins of the English Language.

In conclusion, Dystopian Literature limits language in order to limit freedom by removing individualism that resides in names. So totalitarian governments like Ingsoc and Gileads society would rather deceive their citizens into believing in false reality that their world is fine by indoctrination but also unable to express that theyre oppressed.

Click Here To Order Now!