Emergency Nurses Association: Interest Group Presentation

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Emergency Nurses Association: Interest Group Presentation

Group choice:

Selected group: Emergency Nurses Association
It is abbreviated as ENA
The group is an advocacy institution
ENA focuses on existing emergency laws
The group promotes safe working environments

The selected group for this discussion is the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA). The interest group conducts research to inform or guide existing policies on emergency nursing. The ultimate goal is to ensure existing policies meet the needs of patients and nurses in emergency care settings (Mason, Leavitt, & Chaffee, 2014).

Background:

ENA was established in 1970
The organization is led by aboard.
Directors from agencies form the board.
These include IoM and AHRQ
ENA formed BCEN and CEN.

The interest group was established in 1970 to deal with emerging issues in emergency health settings (Solheim, 2016). The association was established by stakeholders and directors from different agencies. Policymakers and healthcare professionals are encouraged to be part of the group. The organization also supports the Board of Certification in Emergency Nursing (BCEN). This agency supports the Certified Emergency Nurse examination. Its current membership stands at around 42,000 emergency nurses (Solheim, 2016).

Groups key issues:

Tracking different health care programs
Identifying challenges in emergency settings
Supporting the implementation of policies
Monitoring effectiveness of such processes
Supporting different workplace and health policies

The interest group examines the effectiveness of existing programs and related gaps. Research is then done to present adequate models to support or improve them. Patients in need of emergency services are identified in an attempt to allocate resources fairly (Solheim, 2016). The group also seeks to address the challenges facing nurses in emergency care settings.

Interest groups mission:

To support emergency care policies.
To monitor the implementation of programs.
To identify emerging health gaps.
To support the needs of nurses
To publish and present professional guidelines

The groups current mission is to support programs and policies that can address health problems experienced in different emergency care units. The interest group examines and outlines changes that can improve emergency care (Mason et al., 2014). Emerging health gaps are identified and addressed in an attempt to support the needs of more patients and practitioners.

Legislative agenda:

Develop guidelines for new policies
Propose adequate or appropriate policy changes
Attract and include different stakeholders
Inform legislations in different departments
Offer insights for evidence-based programs.

The involvement of policymakers and legislators support the groups legislative agenda. Guidelines and insights are presented to political and healthcare players to support new programs (Hacker, 2015). Stakeholder participation makes it easier for the group to deliver positive results.

Development of the agenda:

The agenda emerged in 1970
Challenges were observed in ICUs
ENA focuses on new practices
Different members and stakeholders are involved.
Group focuses on emergency care policies.

ENAs agenda has been evolving over the years. The original goal was to address the issues affecting different healthcare facilities (Solheim, 2016). The group has expanded its agenda to identify the health problems affecting nurses and patients, minimize care delivery inequalities, and maximize health outcomes.

Communicating the agenda to members:

The board coordinates the communication process
Members attend different meetings frequently.
Different stakeholders are updated periodically.
The group appreciates expert opinions.
Research is undertaken by skilled members.

The association uses meetings and publications to communicate its agenda to members and stakeholders. Updates are presented to different people periodically. Expert opinions are received and considered whenever formulating new policies. Skilled professionals undertake research studies to inform every decision-making process (Mason et al., 2014).

Pushing/promoting agenda:

Decisions are communicated to policymakers efficiently.
Gaps in existing policies are identified.
Potential outcomes are then highlighted.
Positive benefits of agendas or communications
Stakeholders participate in the interest group.

The agenda is communicated to the right audience in a systematic manner. This begins by identifying specific recommendations to improve healthcare. Existing gaps and potential changes are communicated to different legislators. Stakeholders, including policymakers, support the agenda promotion process (Mason et al., 2014). Positive outcomes associated with the proposed agenda are defined and communicated accordingly.

Current lobbying efforts:

The current government has influenced policies
The group is promoting health programs
ENA addresses new emergency concerns
Group also focuses on safety practices
These include seatbelts and child safety

The interest group is currently analyzing the changes experienced in the healthcare sector. Lobbying efforts have been targeting safety policies to minimize injuries, accidents, and falls (Hacker, 2015). The interest grup publishes findings in different journals. The role of competent emergency practitioners continues to get attention. The important objective is to improve safety and reduce emergency cases.

Key partner coalitions:

Members of the federal government
Healthcare professionals, clinicians, and researchers
Physicians, emergency nurses, and hospital representatives
Private payers such as employers
Public groups and social workers

This agency has managed to bring on board a number of participants or partners. For instance, the interest group is characterized by clinicians, researchers, healthcare professionals, and lawmakers (Solheim, 2016). Members of the public and different health institutions are including in the groups agenda. Physicians and insurance companies are also attracted to come up with adequate recommendations. The ultimate goal is to ensure people live in safe environments and acquire adequate emergency services.

Influencing policies at the local, state, and/or national level:

The group influences policies locally
State government members support the processes
Identified ideas also influence national policies
Peoples needs inform these policies
Governments consider every policy suggestion

The ultimate objective of the Emergency Nurses Association is to support the needs of every American citizen. This aim explains why the group has been on the frontline to influence policies at the state, national, and local level (Pear, 2017). The group attracts different players from various localities and organizations in order to influence policies that can improve safety, promote care delivery, and support the needs of emergency nurses.

Key obstacles:

Changes in political leadership influence policies
Health workforce shortage affects the group
Lack of adequate funds or resources
Limited members disorients the groups effectiveness
Time constraints affect decision-making procedures

The interest group has managed to influence a number of policies. Some challenges affecting the healthcare sector have been addressed within the past three decades. However, the group has encountered a number of obstacles such as lack of resources, changing political times, and the nature of the countrys emergency and safety policies (Hacker, 2015). Time constraints affect every decision-making initiative.

Spending allocations:

ENA does not offer direct support
Guidelines are presented to influence allocations
Critical conditions are given priority
Financial resources support ENAs functions
Proposals are presented to support populations

The group is not concerned with financial or resource allocations. However, its agenda is to guide the manner in which resources are acquired and used to tackle various emergency health concerns (Pear, 2017). The proposals presented to different policymakers result in better programs to meet the needs of different populations.

References

Hacker, J. S. (2015). Out of balance: Medicare, interest groups, and American politics. Journal of the American Society on Aging, 1(1), 1-7. Web.

Mason, D. J., Leavitt, J. K., & Chaffee, M. W. (2014). Policy and politics in nursing and health (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders.

Pear, R. (2017). Congress rejects Trump proposals to cut health research funds. The New York Times. Web.

Solheim, J. (2016). Emergency nursing: The profession, the pathway, the practice (1st ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau.

Click Here To Order Now!