Essay on Ozymandias Analysis - Special Academic Support

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Percy Bysshe Shelley represents throughout the entirety of the poem that eventually power won’t amount to anything and will be forgotten or to have no importance.

All that remains of the statue are two vast stone legs standing upright and a head half-buried in sand, along with a boastful inscription describing the ruler as the king of kings whose mighty achievements invoke awe and despair in all who behold them. The inscription stands in ironic contrast to the decrepit reality of the statue, however, underscoring the ultimate transience of political power. The poem critiques such power through its suggestion that both great rulers and their kingdoms will fall to the sands of time. In the poem, the speaker relates a story a traveller told him about the ruins of a colossal wreck of a sculpture whose decaying physical state mirrors the dissolution of its subjects (Ozymandiass) power. Only two upright legs, a face, and a pedestal remain of Ozymandiass original statue, and even these individual parts of the statue are not in great shape: the face, for instance, is shattered.’ Clearly, time hasnt been kind to this statue, whose pitiful state undercuts the bold assertion of its inscription. The fact that even this king of kings lies decaying in a distant desert suggests that no amount of power can withstand the merciless and unceasing passage of time.

The speaker goes on to explain that time not only destroyed this statue, it also essentially erased the entire kingdom the statue was built to overlook. The speaker immediately follows the kings declaration found on the pedestal of the statueLook upon my works, ye Mighty, and despair!with the line Nothing beside remains. Such a savage contradiction makes the kings prideful dare almost comically naïve. Ozymandias had believed that while he himself would die, he would leave a lasting and intimidating legacy through everything he built. Yet his words are ultimately empty, as everything he built has crumbled. The people and places he ruled over are gone, leaving only an abandoned desert whose lone and level sands imply that not even a trace of the kingdoms former glory can be discerned. The pedestals claim that onlookers should despair at Ozymandiass works thus takes on a new and ironic meaning: one despairs not at Ozymandiass power, but at how powerless time and decay make everyone.

The speaker also uses the specific example of Ozymandias to make a broader pronouncement about the ephemeral nature of power and, in turn, to implicitly critique tyranny. The speaker evokes the image of a cruel leader; Ozymandias wears a frown along with the sneer of cold command.’ That such passions are now recorded only on lifeless things (i.e., the statue) is a clear rebuke of such a ruler, and suggests that the speaker believes such tyranny now only exists on the face of a dead and crumbling piece of stone.

The poem’s depiction of the destruction of Ozymandias and his tyranny isnt entirely fictional: Ozymandias is the Greek name for the Egyptian pharaoh Ramses II, who dramatically expanded Egypts empire and who had several statues of himself built throughout Egypt.

By alluding to an actual ancient empire, and an actual king, the poem reminds readers that history is full of the rises and falls of empires. No power is permanent, regardless of how omnipotent a ruler believes himself to be. Even the king of kings may one day be a forgotten relic of an antique land.

Click Here To Order Now!