Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Government Health Policies and Science in the US
According to Michael Greenbergs article titled: Impediments to Basing Government Health Policies on Science in the United State, there is no reliable link between public health policy and what the health researchers find (Greenberg, 1992, p.531). Greenberg states that while a number of scientific discoveries are swiftly integrated into private and political action, other findings are simply overlooked. His article discusses this contradiction with respect to individual response to risks, how the media present the risks, and diverse ability of individuals to react to health information. Greenberg also elucidates on political elites preference for advanced technology science, manipulation and resistance by commercial interests and bureaucratic manipulation for resources and control. He also articulates the vagueness and irregularity of some scientific outcomes (Greenberg, 1992, p. 531).
For example, tobacco smoking is listed by the federal government as the leading cause of death in the US. However, the same federal administration has also granted financial support to the tobacco industry and fights to create more markets for US tobacco exports abroad (Greenberg, 1992, p. 531). Tobacco smoking is a serious health concern because it has disastrous impact on smokers. For example, according to Missouri Department of Health, over 10, 400 tobacco smokers die in the Missouri state yearly (Givel & Glantz, 2000, p.7). In spite of this alarming report, there are no effective laws in the state to regulate tobacco use because the tobacco lobby groups have financed political campaigns for influential lawmakers in Missouri so as to enhance reciprocal political support and trust on a number of tobacco policy matters (Givel & Glantz, 2000, p.8).
Greenberg uses several secondary sources to discuss impediments related to government. He states that the major obstacles to the adoption of scientific health policies are: opposition by tobacco lobby groups and bureaucratic glitches; and the governments preference for advanced technology as opposed to primary prevention methods. For example, following the culmination of World War II, the huge financial support made by the US federal government on advanced technology health research provided extensive political mileage for addressing health issues with least interference from political and economical system. In addition, a robust public support also played a key role in the adoption of advanced technology in healthcare. The media too played a role in this regard as it depicted scientists as individuals with exceptional qualities (Greenberg, 1992, p. 533).
Greenberg states that the US federal government is reluctant to invest in preventive public health programs. For instance, it is now common knowledge that HIV-testing programs should be offered free to individuals who what it. These programs need to be subsidized to make them affordable. However, the US federal government has not taken any step to subsidize HIV-testing programs (Kendal, 1998, p.1). The government has also not shown any interest to finance prevention-based research and execution programs that aim to curb diabetes, heart disease, cancer and other severe ailments to even a tiny percentage of the financial support offer for advanced technology (Greenberg, 1992, p. 534).
Greenberg sums up with an optimistic viewpoint about reducing these impediments. He suggests the need for an interactive forum between the government, corporate officials, scientists and the public to address the risks of tobacco smoking and the impact of adopting scientific-based health policies. Greenberg also suggest that the public should also play an active role in condemning passive smoking and the sale of drugs, and cigarettes to children (Greenberg, 1992, p. 537).
References
Givel, MS., & Glantz, SA. (2000). The public health undermined: The tobacco industrys legacy in Missouri in the 1990s. Web.
Greenberg, M. (1992). Impediments to Basing Government Health Policies on Science in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 35(4), 531-540.
Kendal, B. (1998). Public Health, politics clash over HIV prevention. The Prism. Web.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.