Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Health Workers Experiences During COVID-19 Epidemic
Introduction
In this paper, I am reviewing the journal article by Hanna et al., titled Health and social care professionals experiences providing end-of-life Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic. (Hanna et al., 2021, p.1249-1257). The qualitative study is written collaboratively by healthcare professionals from the University of Oxfords Department of Psychiatry and the University of Liverpools Palliative Care Institute.
Discussion
This journal article focuses on health and social care workers experiences as they offered end-of-life assistance throughout the COVID-19 epidemic. Furthermore, I chose the article because it is accurate, reliable, and evidence-backed (Rose and Johnson, 2020, p.435). The paper encompasses experiences from healthcare professionals who worked in diverse settings such as hospitals, hospices, and nursing homes, providing a comprehensive perspective on this specific issue.
This journal article is being reviewed because it discusses health and social care workers experiences and perspectives on delivering end-of-life care in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 epidemic. The paper investigated three main themes, including healthcare professionals experiences. Delivering end-of-life support and assistance throughout the COVID-19 epidemic. The document also looks into the needs of family members after a relative die amid the COVID-19 epidemic. Finally, the article explores ways families could be adequately assisted at the final stages of life during the COVID-19 epidemic.
The authors major argument was that throughout the COVID-19 dilemma, caregivers endured technical and psychological challenges in delivering end-of-life care. The authors highlight that the challenges were attributed by rising in the proportion of persons undergoing end-of-life care. Low staffing numbers owing to illness and redeployment and the loss of friends or relatives were also factors. The authors also propose that precise standards are necessary to specify when families can contact a patients family while they are getting end-of-life support in an institutional environment; this will reduce conflicts between professionals, families, and health personnel. The authors also claim that it is essential to develop working conditions that encourage self-care and accessibility to psychological assistance to increase the well-being of doctors throughout and after an epidemic.
The main strength of the journal article is that it is representative of medical and community care experts encounters operating in a variety of settings throughout the COVID-19 epidemic (FitzPatrick, 2019, p.211). Including hospitals, hospices, and care facilities, which makes the journal article dependable.
The papers, however, fall short in several ways. For instance, this investigation does not discuss how psycho-social and integrative treatment for workers and their patients altered throughout the pandemic because of distinctions across NHS trusts and nationwide COVID-19 limits (Nassaji, 2020, p.427-431). Additionally, the results are restricted to practitioners categorized as White British and employed in the UK during the COVID-19 epidemic.
Conclusion
To conclude, future research should concentrate on the psychological stages of the global epidemic, which include preparation and retrieval (Zacher and Rudolph, 2020, p.50). For example, it should look into whether instant clinical necessities were prioritized during the executing phase and whether there was room to think about wider scope psycho-social care aspects throughout the recovery phase. Future research should take into account a variety of non-specialist palliative carers who are engaged in the delivery of end-of-life care since the majority of the sample is indicative of practitioners in palliative care contexts. Regardless of their clinical function, other practitioners may need to consider the outcomes. Results are restricted to medical professionals described as White British while practicing in the UK during the COVID-19 epidemic.
Reference List
FitzPatrick, B. (2019) Validity in Qualitative Health Education Research, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(2), pp. 211217.
Hanna, J.R. et al. (2021) Health and Social Care Professionals experiences of providing end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study, Palliative Medicine, 35(7), pp. 12491257.
Nassaji, H. (2020) Good qualitative research, Language Teaching Research, 24(4), pp. 427431.
Rose, J. and Johnson, C.W. (2020) Contextualizing reliability and validity in qualitative research: toward more rigorous and trustworthy qualitative social science in Leisure Research, Journal of Leisure Research, 51(4), pp. 432451.
Zacher, H. and Rudolph, C.W. (2021) Individual differences and changes in subjective well-being during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist, 76(1), pp. 5062.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.