Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
How Does Ibsen Present Traditional Gender Roles In A Dolls House?
Introduction to Ibsen’s Critique of Gender Roles
Henrik Ibsen, a prominent Norwegian playwright, is proclaimed to be the Father of Modern Drama for writing plays that exposed and challenged the social ideologies within the nineteenth-century Norwegian society through the illustration of everyday life. His naturalistic play, A Dolls House, written in 1879, is no exception. Through his central characters and their function, Ibsen criticises the traditional gender roles both men and women are confronted with, in a society more concerned with propriety and reputation than human connections. Set in a comfortably furnished, middle-class household, the play revolves around the protagonist Nora, who represents the conventional middle-class wife, her breadwinner husband Torvald, and Noras childhood best-friend Christine Linde, who symbolises the subservient role held by women in their families. Through these characters and their function, as well as through Noras development from a naïve doll to an independent, liberated woman, Ibsen teaches the importance of self-liberation; of thinking things out for [oneself] and trying to find [ones] own answer to participate in society in a meaningful manner, rather than accepting the roles set in place for oneself by tradition.
Nora: The Embodiment of the Traditional Bourgeois Wife
Ibsen deplores the entrapment of women in nineteenth-century Norway through the protagonist, Nora, who represents the traditional, bourgeoise wife. Initially, Ibsen depicts Nora as frivolous, irrational, and naïve. When she asks Torvald for money, her pleading tone Cant we? Just a little bit? implies cajoling, echoing how a young child begs for a larger allowance. After having her request denied, Nora begins sulking , indicating her immaturity to deal with the issue appropriately as a responsible adult would. Torvald taking out his purse suggests his approval of Noras childishness and his infantilisation of her by treating her like an errant child. Ibsen implies Torvalds ownership of Nora through his nicknames: my squirrel & my little skylark & my little songbird . The possessive my implies that Nora is Torvalds property, and, in conjunction, with a noun that denotes an innocent, caged animal, Ibsen suggests that Nora is the pretty, entrapped creature that Torvald compares her to; reliant on her husband to survive. However, when Nora confesses Nora isnt as silly as you think , Ibsen suggests she is merely playing her role as the traditionally frivolous, submissive wife. In a desperate attempt to keep Krogstad at the bank, Noras wheedling suppose your little squirrel were to ask you ever so nicely implies that she must reduce herself and emphasise her helplessness for him to even consider helping her. As Nora is unable to get what she wants without playing the role of the incapable wife, Ibsen criticises the entrapment of Nora and the bourgeoise wives she represents.
Torvald: The Pressure of the Male Breadwinner Role
Ibsen exposes the societal pressure on men to fulfil their traditional role as the breadwinner of the family through the character of Torvald. Noras confession [Torvalds] so proud of being a man & itd completely wreck our relationship implies that not only does Torvald feel he must solely provide for his family, but any help from Nora will cause him to feel threatened as it endangers his pride and masculinity. The verb wreck further suggests the fragility of their marriage which is fundamentally based on traditional gender roles in which the man must wholly support his wife. Moreover, through Torvalds confession if the rumour got about that [I] had allowed [my] wife to persuade [me]& Id soon feel the consequences Ibsen suggests the social mores embedded in the nineteenth-century Norwegian society; for a mans authority and masculinity to remain unassailable, men must make all important decisions completely independently. When Noras borrowing is revealed, Torvalds first thoughts are for his reputation: I am condemned to humiliation and ruin simply for the weakness of a woman which implies that Torvald is only concerned with how society will react to his familys shame and, therefore, cannot appreciate the sacrifice Nora has made for him. Ibsen utilises Torvalds dialogue no man can be expected to sacrifice his honour and Noras response millions of women have done it to suggest the deep-rooted traditional gender roles embedded in his society: that men must remain honourable and strong whilst women must act in deference to the male figures in their lives. Ibsen creates a moment of pathos for Torvald when he asks, Did you expect me to drag you into all my worries? . This implies that perhaps Torvald has been misguided in his view that, as a male, he must solely take on the responsibility of the household, which suggests, like Nora, Torvald is a victim of his social role. Thus, through the character of Torvald, Ibsen reveals the pressures on men to conform to their traditional gender roles.
Christine Linde: The Plight of Working-Class Women
Ibsen utilises the character of Christine Linde to censure the restrictions of working-class women within their subservient role. Upon reuniting with Nora, Christine is told that she looks paler & [and] thinner to which Christine responds with And & Much, much older , despite only being a bit older than Nora; implying that over the years Christine has tired and withered from the adversities of trying to make ends meet, somehow . While Nora has had a comfortable life with her husband, Christine gave up her poor love, Krogstad, and resorted to a loveless marriage to support her helpless and bedridden mother and her two little brothers , suggesting the only viable option for young women to provide for their families is to marry wealthy. As a widow, Mrs. Linde confides one has to be continually sponging for jobs. One has to live which implies the hardships of gaining financial security to survive, especially as a woman without a husband. In a conversation between Krogstad and Mrs. Linde, Ibsen employs Mrs. Lindes dialogue I had no choice as an emblem for the limited options available to women in the era, implying that women either had to marry or work incredibly hard for financial security and even sacrifice their dreams. Hence, Ibsen utilises the character of Mrs. Linde and her plight to condemn the sacrifices and constraints of working-class women, in nineteenth-century Norway.
Symbolism and Nora’s Journey to Self-Liberation
Through the use of symbolism and Noras character development, Ibsen aids his central message of the importance of self-liberation from traditional gender roles. Whilst Nora is initially portrayed as a submissive, obedient wife, the macaroons symbolise Noras insubordination and her inner passions. When Torvald accuses Nora of indulging in macaroons, she responds with No, Torvald I promise & I could never act against your wishes even though she has just concealed the bag containing macaroons . Ibsen creates dramatic irony through this act of defiance to imply that Nora is not as innocent or foolish as her gender role presumes. After eating the forbidden macaroons once more, Nora comments that she feels really, really happy , suggesting that Nora takes great pleasure in succumbing to her desires, deserting the compliance that is expected of her as a wife, and acting independently of her husbands wishes. Similarly, through the symbol of the loan, Ibsen presents an element of independence and responsibility that lies within Nora. To pay off the loan, Nora has had to stint herself and find one or two other sources of income because it was [her] problem to resolve. This indicates Noras maturity to take responsibility for her own actions as well as her ability to earn money independently of a man. Not only does Nora manage to pay off the loan, despite the adversities of earning money as a woman, but her confession it was great fun & sitting there working and earning money implies that she enjoys financial independence which is a stark contrast from the infantilised child at the outset of the play. Even though the symbols of the loan and macaroons indicate Noras desire for liberation before the climax of the play, it is not until the end of Act Three when Noras romantic illusion of her marriage is shattered that she realises she must leave her family to think things out for [herself] and find [her] own answer . It is this realisation that completes her metamorphosis from the cosseted child to a fully matured being. Hence, Ibsen utilises symbolism as well as Noras character development to reinforce the necessity of self-exploration.
Conclusion: Challenging Gender Norms and the Quest for Individuality
Through the use and function of his main characters, Ibsen challenges the traditional gender roles embedded within his nineteenth-century Norwegian society in A Dolls House. Whilst A Dolls House is ostensibly considered to be a feminist play, Ibsens objective was not to fuel the feminist movement, but to provide a realistic description of humanity where both sexes are confronted with oppressive, traditional gender roles. Ibsen does not criticise the duties of motherhood or marriage, but rather, through his characters, he shows that for one to be truly successful and participate meaningfully in society, they must first reject their social roles to learn to be an independent individual.
Bibliography
- Kennedy, Bobby. The Father of Modern Drama. Writers Theatre, 2 Jan. 2014, www.writerstheatre.org/blog/father-modern-drama/. Accessed 2 May 2020.
- Templeton, Joan. The Doll House Backlash: Criticism, Feminism, and Ibsen. Pmla, vol. 104, no. 1, 1989, p. 28., doi:10.2307/462329.
- Archer, William. Introduction to The Collected Works of Henrik Ibsen, edited and translated by Archer. Scribner, 1906-1912.
- Barillaro, Angie. Literature Guides & Worksheets for TeachersA Dolls House. Radiant Heart Publishing, 2011.
- Durbach, Errol. A Doll’s House: Ibsen’s Myth of Transformation, Twayne Masterworks Studies. Twayne Publishers, 1991.
- Finney, Gail. ‘Ibsen and Feminism,’ in The Cambridge Companion to Ibsen, edited by James McFarlane. Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 89-105.
- Franc, Miriam Alice. Ibsen in England. The Four Seas Co., 1919, pp. 131-33.
- Goodman, Walter. Review of A Doll’s House, The New York Times, May 14, 1986.
- Hemmer, Bjorn. ‘Ibsen and the Realistic Problem Drama,’ in The Cambridge Companion to Ibsen, edited by James McFarlane. Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 68-88.
- LitCharts. A Dolls House Study Guide from LitCharts. LitCharts, 2013, www.litcharts.com/lit/a-doll-s-house. Accessed 11 Mar. 2020.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.