Information Literacy: Peer-Reviewing Process Cycle

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Information Literacy: Peer-Reviewing Process Cycle

Peer reviewing is an essential part of the scientific publishing process. It is necessary in order to ensure the accuracy and quality of information presented in the peer-reviewed article. The peer-review cycle is comprised of four points, which are as follows (Fernandez, 2012):

Writing and submitting an article for review
Editorial analysis and consistency checking
Peer-reviewing process
Publishing of the article

Each of these points is important for different reasons, as without them the cycle itself would be broken. In other words, without each of the steps, it would be impossible to complete the process. It is impossible to review an article that is not written and formatted according to the requirements of the journal. At the same time, the peer-reviewing process is made pointless if there are no means of publishing an article. Editors are different from peer-reviewers in a few ways. First, while peer-reviewers are typically specialists in the field, editors are often not. Their job is to conduct an initial screening of the article, ensuring that it conforms to the subject and format of the journal, and making a decision to publish or refuse an article. The reviewers, on the other hand, only provide recommendations and criticism in order to improve the article, and spot any inconsistencies that are present in the paper.

In order to determine if an article is peer-reviewed or not, one must look at its source. Typically, peer-reviewed articles can be found in books and scientific journals dedicated to a particular subject. Newspapers, websites, and other sources typically do not contain peer-reviewed information. One of the best ways to look for peer-reviewed data is to browse through dedicated databases, such as MEDLINE, CINAHL, and others.

References

Fernandez, C. (2012). A day in a life of a scientific reviewer. Web.

Click Here To Order Now!