Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Kotters and Dr. Feinbergs Management Teachings
Introduction
John Kotter presented the Kotters 8 Step Change Model to help organizations enhance their capacity to adapt to new situations and improve their likelihood of succeeding. He outlined the eight phases for strengthening and reforming an organizations culture, development, and relative performance clearly and concisely. Associations may avoid disappointment and become proficient in implementing change by following this development plan (Katsufrakis, 2012). As a result, organizations will never need to change the progressions again, and their chances of success will increase. Change is usually a difficult concept for any business to grasp; yet, corporate success is a foregone conclusion if this process is handled correctly (Radwan, 2020). There are several parallels and distinctions between Kotters and Dr. Feinbergs teachings. One of their crucial teaching themes refers to the impossibility of organizational without changes.
Similarities and Differences in Views
Both researchers teachings center on the idea of change as something that must be rooted in inadequate reasons centered on the organizations core growth strategy. Furthermore, they promote change as a necessary component of organizational growth and performance. However, they diverge on achieving short-term victories; Kotter tends to argue for long-term, sustainable victories rather than short-term, transitory victories (Katsufrakis, 2012). I feel that adding a ninth stage to Kotters eight-step transformation process would make it more general and sufficient. This stage would focus on evaluating change and its effects on organizational culture. A change review process is always required to identify the amount or degree of influence it has on the overall performance and progress of the company.
Biblical Perspective
Both Kotter and Dr. Feinberg are in line with the biblical scripture. For example, the book of 2 Corinthians (NLT) says, This means that anyone who belongs to Christ has become a new person. The old life is gone; a new life has begun! ( New bodies , n. d., 5:17). It presumes that new ideas and changes signify the completely fresh start; thus, changes can be beneficial.
Conclusion
In conclusion, change is rarely seen as a positive phenomenon by employees. Whatever the case may be, they are critical in implementing advancement. Following Kotters 8-Step Change Model and Dr. Feinbergs teachings will help organizations implement change. The necessity of staff engagement and acceptance is stressed for the operations overall viability. Rather than the actual transition process, the emphasis is on preparing for and building tolerance. Adding certain stages to Kotters processes will be more beneficial to all enterprises.
References
Katsufrakis, P. (2012). Changing the culture of health care education. In Nash, D. B Health care quality: The clinicians primer (pp. 329-335). American College of Physician Executives.
New Bodies. (n.d.) BibleGateaway. Web.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.