Managing Organizational Change of Arthur Anderson

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Managing Organizational Change of Arthur Anderson

Table of Contents

Introduction
Accessory to the crimes
The indictment of top directors
Liquidation of Arthur Anderson
Conclusion
References

Introduction

This essay shall be taking up the case study of Arthur Anderson, the accounting major, who was adversely affected due to fraudulent practices and the subsequent closure of Enron, the public energy company.

Arthur Anderson was held guilty of corporate misfeasance and obstruction of justice and had to finally close down audit operations.

Following the conviction, multi-million dollar lawsuits brought by Enron investors and shareholders demanding compensation are likely to follow and could bankrupt the firm. (Anderson guilty in Enron case 2002).

Accessory to the crimes

The illegal practices in Enron reached its zenith when, under instructions from their auditors, Arthur Anderson, the management and staff of Enron began destroying and shredding all significant papers that could connect them to illegal practices being carried out by Enron, in attempts to shield them from law of the land.

In 2001, the Enron empire collapsed. The firms bankruptcy was the largest in US history, surpassed seven months later by WorldComs bankruptcy. (Enron debacle 1996).

The indictment of top directors

The indictment of the top directors of Enron and their subsequent trials led to the unearthing of embezzlement of millions of dollars by the top management of Enron, either with or without the connivance of their auditors, Arthur Anderson.

The financial impact of Enrons collapse has been widespread, leaving a blot on investors balance sheets and erasing the retirement savings of many employees who sank everything into the companys 401(k) plan. (Balay 2002).

Liquidation of Arthur Anderson

One of the most important things that happened was that the firm, Arthur Anderson was also subsequently forced into liquidation after the Enron debacle

Were they able to avoid or minimize damage to their reputation?

This brought an end to the reputation and credibility that was earned by Arthur Anderson, as part of the Big Five, along with top accounting firms like Ernst and Young, Price Waterhouse Coopers, Deloitte Touche, KPMG, etc. due to the wanton activities of a few irresponsible officials. After the Enron debacle, there was only the Big Four, sans Arthur Anderson. Strong laws like the Sarbanes Oxley laws were enacted to prevent future corporate malfeasance.

Conclusion

The disgrace to Enron and, by extension, auditors Arthur Anderson, is testimony to the fact that corporate crimes, however well managed, may not be able to see light at the end of the tunnel. The long arms of the law could track down even corporate giant defaulters.

References

Anderson guilty in Enron case 2002, BBC News: World Edition, Web.
Balay, DH 2002, The call: Enron debacle offers tough lessons in the ethics: charges of conflict of interest, securities fraud, Holston Conference: United Methodist Church, Web.
Enron debacle 1996, Riskglossary.com.

Click Here To Order Now!