The de Stijl Movement: Rethinking Space - Special Academic Support

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

The de Stijl movement is a new idea of organizing space, born in the war-isolated Holland. The style was a way of breaking out of the standard framework of art and moving toward neoplasticism (Frampton, 1980). The artist Theo van Doesburg can be called the founder of the movement. However, the question of who can be called the leader of the movement remains relevant.

Doesburg introduced abstract geometry to new architectural solutions. He created a solid theoretical basis and developed several layouts (Preece, 2018). He limited himself to projects and did not create buildings that reflected the movements tenets. Despite Doesburgs significant contribution, it is difficult to call him a true leader. Among de Stijls followers, several architects were able to bring the designs to reality (Spurr, 2016). Cornelius de Esterne created the Privat Hotel, but Gerrit Rietvelds work best represents the idea of the movement. Rietveld designed the Schroeder House, embodying as many of de Stijls ideas as possible (Van Halem, 2017). However, he cannot be called the leader either, as Rietveld quickly started practice architecture individually.

Perhaps the thought leader of the de Stijl movement should be called the painter Piet Mondrian. Not only did he, along with Doesburg, develop the idea of organizing space, but he also greatly influenced art (Wenderski, 2017). One can argue that Mondrian did not impact architecture directly, but thanks to his work, abstraction has developed rapidly. It is because of his contribution and influence that Mondrian is considered the leader of the movement.

Thus, de Stijl became a new branch of art, born under the influence of Doesburg and his understanding of space. Despite his significant theoretical contribution, the architect G Rietveld was the best person to embody the principles of the movement. And the ideological leader should be called Piet Mondrian, who pushed the public to rethink space because of his paintings.

References

Frampton, K. (1980). Modern architecture: A critical history. Thames and Hudson.

Preece, R. J. (2018). Theo van Doesburgs space-time construction #3 and composition XX in the painting toward architecture exhibitions (1947-52). Artdesigncafe. Web.

Spurr, D. (2016). The machine aesthetic in Joyce and De Stijl. European Joyce Studies, 24, 7-19. Web.

Van Halem, L. (2017). Editorial: Nota bene: De Stijl. The Rijksmuseum Bulletin, 65(2), 122-127. Web.

Wenderski, M. (2017). Cultural mobility in the interwar avant-garde art network: Poland, Belgium and the Netherlands. Routledge.

Click Here To Order Now!