Why is peer review important to research and Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)? What

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Why is peer review important to research and Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)? What are some goals of qualitative research? Of quantitative research? Can you see how the knowledge they produce differs? Give a clinical example.
Submit one peer-reviewed journal source with your initial post. See rubric for details.
N350 OL Discussion Board Rubric – 40pts
N350 OL Discussion Board Rubric – 40pts
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Responses
14 to >11.0 ptsMeets or Exceeds Expectations
The initial post applies course content sufficiently by expanding on the main points of the prompt; responses exhibit critical thinking and analysis. 1 journal peer-reviewed journal source submitted within 5 years in the main discussion post.
11 to >8.0 ptsMostly Meets Expectations
Content knowledge is exhibited by identification of the main topics; there is some evidence of critical thinking and analysis, but responses may be insufficient or lacking in detail.
8 to >5.0 ptsBelow Expectations
Understanding of content knowledge is poorly exhibited and insufficient in critical thinking, analysis, and detail. Some main discussion topics are not covered or significantly digress from the topic at hand.
5 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Initial response is missing or provides no indication of understanding. Main topics are not covered.
14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReponses to Peers
14 to >11.0 ptsMeets or Exceeds Expectations
Replies to peers are well developed and insightful, and provide an opportunity for response. Responses promote a discussion either by sharing prior knowledge and experiences, making meaningful connections with course content, asking meaningful questions, or challenging viewpoints. Responds to peers on at least two separate days.
11 to >8.0 ptsMostly Meets Expectations
Replies to peers are mostly developed and provide an opportunity for response. Responses contribute to the discussion either by sharing prior knowledge and experiences, making connections with course content, or asking questions. Responds to peers on two separate days.
8 to >5.0 ptsBelow Expectations
Some replies to peers are missing or poorly developed and provide little or no opportunity for response. Responses do little to contribute to the discussion. Responds to peers on one day.
5 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
No responses to peers are present AND/OR one word responses are provided.
14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
8 to >6.0 ptsMeets or Exceeds Expectations
Written in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. Responses are mostly error free. Information from sources is paraphrased appropriately and accurately referenced and cited in current APA style when applicable.
6 to >4.0 ptsMostly Meets Expectations
Writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is paraphrased, referenced, and cited correctly in current APA style.
4 to >2.0 ptsBelow Expectations
Writing is generally unclear and unorganized. Several errors in spelling and grammar. Information from sources is missing or improperly cited.
2 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
Errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension, AND/OR writing includes slang or is inappropriate for academic discourse.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation
4 to >3.0 ptsMeets or Exceeds Expectations
Meets or exceeds the minimum number of initial postings and replies to peers and instructors. Posts on 3 separate days.
3 to >2.0 ptsMostly Meets Expectations
Provided slightly less than the minimum amount of initial posts and replies to peers and instructors. Posts on 3 separate days.
2 to >1.0 ptsBelow Expectations
Provided significantly less than the minimum amount of initial posts and replies to peers and instructors. Posts on 3 separate days.
1 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
There was little to no evidence of active participation in the discussion board, initial postings and/or replies to peers and instructors. Does not post on 3 separate days.
4 pts
Total Points: 40

Click Here To Order Now!