1) Address the following prompt in a formal outline. Identify a clear stance in

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

1) Address the following prompt in a formal outline. Identify a clear stance in your thesis statement based on the following prompt: Identify your stance on the great debate regarding whether rhetoric is, in fact, declining over time based on your knowledge of design theory. Pinpoint any loopholes in the theory claiming that rhetoric is declining with your knowledge of design in the modern world. If you believe that is declining, you would bring specific theories and examples. Provide research from a modern rhetoric and design theorist that backs your idea if you believe that rhetoric is not declining. Conclude by explaining whether the design theory of a modern rhetoric and design theorist can be shown to improve modern business, industry, or technology. Utilize the term “architectonic” to support your example.Overall structure: a clear thesis statement identifying your stance on whether rhetoric is declining throughout time based on your research on rhetoric and design with at least three main points that you will focus on in each of the four to five body paragraphs in a chronological order of importance. In the first body paragraph give context about the debate among scholars. In the second and third body paragraphs, identify any similarities and loopholes in the theory claiming rhetoric is declining using a theorist on rhetoric and design to back your original claims. In the fourth and possibly fifth body paragraph, focus on the concept of “architectonic” to empower you to resolve the issue by explaining whether the design theory of modern rhetoric and design can be shown to effectively improve modern business, industry, or technology. The conclusion paragraph should explain how the illustrations proved your claims and reflect on your findings. It should explain how your research stands out.*The points in the outline that are in bold in the outline are required for this outline.2) Complete the outline using the following format:Outline Format(Running head) Header: Your Last Name pg.Your NameThe Professor’s nameClass and assignment05 Dec 2024
Title: Research Paper on Rhetoric and Design: Create Your Own Title

I. Introduction A. Topic sentence-1sentence B. Background information regarding your topic: 2-3 sentences C. Describe the debate among scholars: 2-3 sentences. D. Thesis: state your stance- making a claim that is a hypothesis that can be proved in several points-1 sentence. Make sure to define all of your terms in your introduction.
Optional begin with the thesis statement instead of the entire introductory paragraph for Roman Numeral I.*
II. Background information.A. Transition from the last paragraph to the present.B. Describe how the debate came about.
C. Describe and define two predominate views about the issue (make a list of the pros and cons of your argument before writing the paper) and cite evidence.D. Describe why it is important in the context of your argument.E. Conclude by summarizing the main point of the argument.III. First main point of your paper that proves your thesis.
Transition by connecting the main idea in the last paragraph to the present.
This should be a complex sentence. B. State your first claim in regards to the specific aspect of the thesis you are focusing on whether it is building your stance or is based on an opposing view you will refute. Make claims of fact, value, or policy based on ethos, pathos, or logos. You can either make a claim about what the opposing views about the topic state or make a claim about the side you agree with.C. Cite evidence in quote or paraphrase-you should only quote one sentence. Cite as follows: (author’s last name pg) or (“article title”)D. Explain what the quote indicates. (Do this only in the research paper).
E. Explain how the quote proves your point or refute it. (Do this only in the research paper).
F. Make another claim based on this concept that is either building on connections you made in the first claim or bring in evidence that contributes to defining the claim in more detail such as case studies, expert opinions, testimonies, anecdotal evidence, scenarios, observations, facts, or statistics.G. Cite evidence.H. Explain what it means and how it proves your point. (Do this only in the research paper).
I. Conclude by explaining how you proved it. (Do this only in the research paper).
IV. Second main point, or a continuation of the first main point in your thesis, and so forth. A. Transition from the last paragraph to the present.B. State your first claim.C. Cite evidence.D . Explain what it means and how it proves your point. (Do this only in the research paper.
E. You can then make a claim that analyzes their argument by using better evidence to make a more focused claim to prove your point or refute an opposing view again.
F. Explain what it means and how it proves your pointG. Conclude by connecting the main idea in the paragraph back to the thesis.V. Third main point in the thesis statement.
A. Transition from the last paragraph to the present.B. State your first claim.C. Cite evidence.D . Explain what it means and how it proves your point.
E. You can then make a claim that analyzes their argument by using better evidence to make a more focused claim to prove your point or refute an opposing view again.
F. Explain what it means and how it proves your pointG. Conclude by connecting the main idea in the paragraph back to the thesis.VI. Ditto Marks Tied to the Third Main Point (The paper may be six paragraphs. This paragraph is optional)VII. Conclusion Paragraph A. No new information and it is not a reiteration of the thesis.B. Explain exactly how you proved your point and how your essay stayed focused on the topic.
C. Call to action: how did your research contribute to society or the world in a greater context.D. How did you solve the problem-based issue? You can describe this in a greater contextE. End with a statement that captures what the purpose of the paper is.It is recommended that you vary between paragraphs that build your claim and refute an opposing view to balance your argument and cohesively build to the main point by the time you reach the conclusion.

Click Here To Order Now!