Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.
Write an argumentative paper on the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee’s role in the advice and consent clause of the Constitution, focusing on the confirmation hearings of Justices Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh. Use the provided links to opening statements, transcriipts, and controversies surrounding Anita Hill and Christine Blasey Ford to support your discussion.
Your goal is to analyze whether the hearings followed Senate and Judiciary Committee rules fairly. Include at least three outside sources, exploring whether the advice and consent process is effective. Consider reviewing similar hearings and focus on why Senate hearings differ from judicial trials, particularly regarding rules of evidence.
Use your annotated bibliography as a basis for organization in your paper.
Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)
NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.