In this assignment, you will debate the benefits and drawbacks of approaching yo

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

In this assignment, you will debate the benefits and drawbacks of approaching your clinical work from both of these perspectives: Evidence-Based Practice and/or Practice-Based Evidence. In a paper, define both terms and talk about what each one means to you as a clinician, a researcher, and an educator. Spend some time discussing the differences between both perspectives. How are they both beneficial, and where does each one of them come up short? Be sure to include some detail about the ethics of practicing from an empirically-based theoretical perspective (or not practicing from one). Be sure to situate your conversation in what you know about other non-MFT mental health disciplines. What is the science behind their methods compared to the way you practice?
In your discussion, be sure to address the following questions:
What do you know about how applicable evidence-based treatment models are too diverse populations? Are they culturally sensitive enough, or do they need to be adapted for specific populations to ensure they are ethically implemented?
Is it enough to know that the models are evidence-based, or does the evidence have to be collected from a variety of populations?
Reflect on how “universal” the human experience really is. And, if evidence-based models can really only apply to the groups that have contributed to the data, how applicable can they be at all?
Consider your professional identity related to this dialogue. What is your role as an MFT scholar? Where will your influence be felt? What is your obligation to make professional contributions to the development of the field? How do you see yourself advancing the evidence-base for what we do as MFTs?
Length: 2-3 pages
References: Include a minimum of 5 scholarly resources.
Bridging the Clinician/Researcher Gap with Systemic Research: The Case for Process Research, Dyadic, and Sequential Analysis
Oka, M., & Whiting, J. (2013). Bridging the clinician/researcher gap with systemic research: The case for process research, dyadic, and sequential analysis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 39(1), 17-27.
This resource explains the persisting researcher-clinician gap and critiques linear research methodology. The authors call for more clinical, systemic research methods to complement the field of MFT.
The Divide between “Evidence-Based” Approaches and Practitioners of Traditional Theories of Family Therapy
Dattilio, F. M., Piercy, F. P., & Davis, S. D. (2014). The divide between “evidenced-based” approaches and practitioners of traditional theories of family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 40(1), 5-16.
Discusses views of evidence-based approaches, including concerns. Provides recommendations for viewing these models and for bridging the clinician-researcher gap.
Common Principles of Couple Therapy
Benson, L. A., McGinn, M. M., & Christensen, A. (2012). Common principles of couple therapy. Behavior Therapy, 43(1), 25–35.
This article outlines the five common principles of evidence-based couple therapy models and how models implement these principles.
The Contribution of Cultural Competence to Evidence-Based Care for Ethnically Diverse Populations
Huey, S. J., Tilley, J. L., Jones, E. O., & Smith, C. A. (2014). The contribution of cultural competence to evidence-based care for ethnically diverse populations. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 305-338.
This article emphasizes that research generally shows that psychotherapy is effective across cultural groups. The authors discuss that while there is a push for cultural adaptations of models the evidence is mixed about whether or not cultural competence is an effective piece to add to existing models. Three models for approaching cultural competence are reviewed (skills-based model, adaptation model, and process-oriented model).
What Does “Couple” Mean in Couple Therapy Outcome Research? A Systematic Review of the Implicit and Explicit, Inclusion and Exclusion of Gender and Sexual Minority Individuals and Identities
Spengler, E. S., DeVore, E. N., Spengler, P. M., & Lee, N. A. (2020). What does ”couple” mean in couple therapy outcome research? A systematic review of the implicit and explicit, inclusion and exclusion of gender and sexual minority individuals and identities. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 46(2), 240-255.
This review evaluates the extent to which gender minorities have been included and excluded from couple therapy outcome research. Authors provide recommendations for more affirming, inclusive approaches to couple therapy research.
The Development and Evolution of Family Therapy Research: Its Impact on Practice, Current Status, and Future Directions
Sexton, T. L., & Datchi, C. (2014). The development and evolution of family therapy research: Its impact on practice, current status, and future directions. Family Process, 53(3), 415-433.
This article reviews the history and evolution of research in the MFT field and the ongoing concerns about the applicability of research to the real world of practice. A discussion of the implications of family therapy research and future directions are provided.

Click Here To Order Now!