Please paraphrase this tobic: The vaiable counting methodology where compared th

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Please paraphrase this tobic: The vaiable counting methodology where compared the numbers enumeration of E.coli by spread plate and poor plate methodology
Please write up the report as the following instructions and please add and use the results ( the picture that has petri dishes+tables) from the document I provided. As well as, please avoid the similarity and plagiarism except the results.
I provided the same report, so please just use the results which I mentioned but should the result analysis in different way.
Please write up in English as a second langauge.
The report should include the following below:
Aim: The Ames are all to do with what you’re going to be exposed to in terms of the practicals that you’re doing, i.e., being able to utilise sterile technique and be able to utilise statistics and report writing.
Introduction: So you’re saying you’re comparing plate and plate for E.coli.
You need some background information of why people are interested in E.coli. What does it do? Where is it used?
And then some information about the spread and pour plate.
If there’s information in the literature when it’s that use, how is it used. And then you finish up with this with the null hypothesis or stating what the null hypothesis for this set of experiments are.
Materials and methods: you need to say what you did.
So how did you do your dilutions? What did you use in terms of the volumes in the dilution to get that one mil for each of the three replicates of the Por plate and 100 microliters for each of the replicates of the spread plate.
So what did you do? What the general information was.
Statistical Analysis: the program is mentioned in the provided document.
The results: The results shouldn’t just be the tables and graphs.
There should be a small amount of text with it,
introducing it so the reader knows what they’re looking at.
And then those tables and graphs which we discussed today
how you’re going to do these types of calculations.
Again, you just need to introduce what you’ve done, how
you did it, and then put that into the report.
Tables, graphs legends, tables, graphs and references do not count in the total thousand words that we’re indicating to use.
Discussion: general discussion about the methods that was used.
How does your data relate to what’s found in the literature?
What does the literature tell you?
What you your data is concerned is is your is E.coli different from other microorganisms that have been addressed in the literature?
Conclusion: Should be based on your results, what results did you get? What your conclusion.
Referencing: Harvard referencing methodology. So in-text citation should be Jones et al.
As well as, should have some references from journals.

Click Here To Order Now!