Literacy With an Attitude by Patrick J. Finn Review

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!

Literacy With an Attitude by Patrick J. Finn Review

During the course of recent decades, the quality of educational standards in American high schools has been undermined to such an extent that, even upon being graduated, many of todays students still have a hard time while trying to locate America on the worlds map. This statement correlates rather well with the fact that, during the same period, the operational status of many high schools has been transformed from being the places of learning into adult kindergartens or even academies of crime, where students are being searched on possession of drugs and guns before they can enter the classroom. Such situation is a direct result of the fact that, during the course of the last twenty years, neo-Liberal sophisticates were in charge of designing the countrys educational policies, while firmly believing that students chances to attain social prominence are being defined by their understanding of different forms of oppression, rather than by the rate of their IQ.

In his book Literacy with an attitude: Educating working-class children in their own self-interest, Patrick J. Finn defines the conceptual essence of the Liberal approach to education: What will most inspire the learners in discussion and reflection on his or her own experiences, particularly his or her own oppression& Many children in urban America are oppressed by a few key institutions: school, family, and community (2009, p. 174). Therefore, it comes as no surprise that, as time goes by, the effectiveness of Americas system of education continues to be progressively undermined, which provides individuals like Finn with yet another chance to turn their talent in whining about inequality into the instrument of generating a commercial profit. In this paper, we will aim at exploring this thesis even further, while referring to the motifs, contained in the 2003 movie Radio, as such that reveals the utter conceptual fallaciousness of the neo-Liberal approach to education.

The audience of Radio is best defined as consisting of bored and sentimental housewives, who derive great pleasure from being exposed to cinematographic interpretations of how underprivileged individuals struggle with institutionalized racism, sexism, male chauvinism, etc. This explains this movies popularity among marginalized individuals, despite the fact that it promotes the essentially nonsensical idea that mentally and physically healthy students might benefit enormously from socializing with retards. What also attracts this kind of audience to Radio is that its producers had made a point in portraying masculine virtues of health, rationale, and intellect as being inferior to feminine virtues of sappiness, spirituality, and irrational tolerance.

The movie Radio has been used to justify the process of Americas system of education being ruined. It is a well-known fact that the dropout rates among Black and Hispanic students in American high schools account for as high as 45%, which has to do with these students genetically predetermined inability to operate with highly abstract categories. Yet, the mentioning of this fact is now considered taboo, which is why Hollywood moviemakers try their best to promote the idea that it is namely institutionalized poverty, which explains earlier mentioned categories of students intellectual inadequacy. This is exactly the reason why movie producers strived to emphasize Radios low social status, even though his inability to enroll in Hannas High had solely to do with his mental retardation.

Radio belongs to the cinematographic genre of drama. It is being designed to inspire cheap sentiments in the hearts of liberal-minded female moviegoers. However, it is highly doubtful whether mentally adequate White males might feel emotionally comfortable while being exposed to films motifs, simply because, as it is being rightly noticed by Finn: The male chauvinist discourse and the feminist discourse are each defined in many ways in contrast or opposition to the other (2009, p. 109). In its turn, this explains why Coach Johns male friends did not think of his attraction to Radio as being entirely normal.

The historical theme, explored throughout the movies entirety, appears to be concerned with the legacy of Americas racism. Nowadays, students are being taught to believe that, even as recently as thirty years ago, evil White racists enjoyed an undisputed authority in the field of education. This suggestion corresponds rather well to Finns insistence that, during the course of the seventies: A number of White students were surprised by the varieties of racism Black students encountered (2009, p. 180). Thus, there can be very little doubt as to the movies high degree of politically motivated ideologization.

The commentary, promoted by Radio, in regards to the theme of racism, can be articulated as follows: In order for White students to adopt tolerance as the integral component of their existential mode, they need to remain utterly ignorant towards the issues that can hardly be considered tolerable. Moreover, they must also be willing to sacrifice their chances to attain social prominence in the future, so that mentally retarded but unique individuals would be able to hang out with these students for no particular reason, whatsoever  thus, increasing the levels of tolerance within American society. This kind of commentary resonates with what represents the foremost Liberal agenda in the field of education, promoted by Finn in his book with utter frankness: Basic literacy does not lead automatically to higher forms of thinking, either in societies or in individuals(!) (2009, p. 123). Apparently, the author firmly believed that ones ability to indulge in constant whining about inequality is being so much more socially valuable, as compared to ones ability to solve complex mathematical equations.

The movies actual importance can be best assessed from a historical perspective. Apparently, Radio provides viewers with insight on technical aspects of how hawks of political correctness strive to undermine students chances to obtain a high-quality education. When the process of designing the countrys socio-political policies will be adjusted to correspond to the notion of sanity again, the movie Radio would be increasingly resorted to as an example of what happens when existentially inadequate people find their way into governmental offices.

The readings we have completed for the course have a largely supplemental role, when it comes to understanding the movies actual significance, simply because this significance is being self-evident. Radio promotes the idea that the strength of ones intellectual powers is of no importance, whatsoever. Yet, the objective reality points out to something entirely opposite  the fact that America continues to be associated with the worlds highest standards of living, has nothing to do with the countrys citizens spirituality, tolerance or multicultural progressiveness, but with their ability to act as facilitators of cultural and scientific progress, while solely relying on their sense of rationale, during the course of the process.

The conclusion of this paper can be summarized as follows: The watching of Radio did not bring us closer to the realization of how should educators address their professional duties. On the contrary  it showed that the lack of teachers professional adequacy is being exponentially proportionate to the strength of their willingness to defy the notion of rationale as euro-centric, and therefore evil.

References

Finn, P. (2009). Literacy with an attitude: Educating working-class children in their own self-interest. New York: State University of New York Press.

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?
We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.
You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Click Here To Order Now!