Comparative Analysis of Enlightenment and Romanticism

Do you need this or any other assignment done for you from scratch?

We assure you a quality paper that is 100% free from plagiarism and AI.

You can choose either format of your choice ( Apa, Mla, Havard, Chicago, or any other)

NB: We do not resell your papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

NB: All your data is kept safe from the public.

Comparative Analysis of Enlightenment and Romanticism

Firstly, Enlightenment is a era that stressed on rationalism. It is characterized people for being self determination and more like fulfillment of individual aptitudes. However, Romanticism is more like individualism, emotions and nature. The Age of Enlightenment opened the ways to free reasoning and improvement. For example, mathematics, astronomy, politics and more. At the finish of the Age of Enlightenment, the Romantic Era was conceived and it was by all accounts in challenge to the thoughts that the Enlightenment had conveyed to society. Even thought both Enlightenment and Romanticism were built up around increasingly self-reliant and development, Enlightenment and the Romantic are differentiate essentially. These two periods varied in pretty much every perspective, including their convictions, explanations behind appearing, and the effects that they have had on society.

In my view, I think both Enlightenment and Romanticism are rebellious. The Enlightenment was a transformation against religion. On the other hand, Romanticism was an against movement for Enlightenment. Actually they both played more on individualism. Enlightenment took individual independent as their own personal feeling. While Romanticism concentrated on individualistic sentiment. So I think, in spite of the fact that their idea on individual was unique and underscored the individualist appropriate to intensity of their own individual. Besides that, it can be seen that Enlightenment and Romanticism have different thoughts about nature. Enlightenment believer tends to clarify, watch and study the nature of man. But for Romanticism concentrated more on the traditional side of nature and natural side of man. In my view, they both look to nature and both motivation and also a source of learning in mans limits.

My view as a Muslim is the contrast is religion and the portrayal of God between these two era. Rather than the non-intelligent God as imagined by Enlightenment believe, Romanticism people perceived God as a profound power and valued the ethical principles lectured by religious belief. Medieval times which were considered as dark ages by Enlightenment on account of superstition and devotion, was valued by Romanticism scholars on account of social consistency and religious. While the Enlightenment viewed history as simple confirmations of human obliviousness, Romanticism saw history as one of a kind substance and esteemed local society and nearby conventions.

Another real conflict between these two was human emotions. While the Enlightenment contended that human sentiments block unwavering understanding, Romanticism commended emotions as one of a kind element of people. Romanticism trusted that the mind startle nature of human instinct is outside the ability to understand of reason and normal reasoning. They thought about that creative and instinctive scholars had a superior understanding into life and human instinct. The artists, writers, musicians and others thinkers of Romanticism period broke the guidelines and methods underlined and set up amid illumination and thought about them as hindrance to creative ability.

In conclusion the Enlightenment and Romantic are different from numerous points of view. Intelligence and thinking rule the Enlightenment while sentiments and feelings ruled over the Romantic time frame. Regardless of the distinctions, the two of them started from a progressive structure. Even so we have to open our minds and look for the world from contradicting points of view.

Click Here To Order Now!